Tag Archives: teachers

Celebrate National Day on Writing on October 19

National Day on WritingOctober 20, 2012, will mark NCTE‘s fourth annual National Day on Writing (U. S. Senate Resolution 565). Because October 20 falls on Saturday this year, NCTE and collaborating organizations are inviting us to celebrate on October 19. This year NCTE is partnering with  The New York Times Learning NetworkNational Writing ProjectMozilla Hive Learning Network NYCEdutopiaNational Novel Writing MonthDigital Learning DayCommon Sense MediaThe College of Saint RosePulitzer Center on Crisis ReportingCreative CommonsSchool Library Journal, and FridayReads to encourage you and your students to take part in a global conversation on Twitter about writing and the role it plays in your life. For ideas about what to post, just click on the links for any of the collaborating sponsors.

If you decide to participate and/or if you decide to invite your students to participate, please post using the hashtag #WhatIWrite (and if space permits, #dayonwriting). The goal is to call attention to the remarkable variety of writing that people from all walks of life engage in across the nation and to recognize the important role writing has in all our lives.

Let’s get #WhatIWrite to be a trending topic on Twitter on Friday!

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Creative Writing, Nonfiction Writing, Student Opportunities, Teacher Opportunities

EngageNY Publishes Evidence Guide for ELA 6-12

On October 10, 2012, EngageNY published tools to capture evidence of the six shifts in practice necessitated by the adoption of the New York State Common Core Learning Standards for ELA and Literacy. Please take a look at the evidence guide for grades 6-12 to get a clearer idea of the kinds of instructional practices that reflect implementation of the shifts. These guides were developed by Student Achievement Partners.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Common Core Standards, Teacher Opportunities

Fall 2012 National Humanities Center’s America in Class Online Seminars

The National Humanities CenterThe National Humanities Center has released its online seminar schedule for Fall 2012. These seminars are targeted to provide ELA and social studies teachers with professional development to deepen their content knowledge and to promote the teaching of the analytical and close reading skills called for by the Common Core Standards. America in Class seminars, conducted by leading scholars, will address how to use primary source materials such as historical documents, literature, and works of art to explore topics such as slavery in British North American and consumer politics in the American Revolution, to study works of literature such as The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin and Poe’s “The Raven” in context, and to examine how artists depict America–among other topics.

Seminar texts are provided free online.

Seminars typically cost $35 each. Teachers in the Greece Central School District may contact me for a promotional code that will enable you to register for Fall 2012 seminars at no charge.

Leave a comment

Filed under Common Core Standards, Professional Development, Teacher Opportunities

Balancing Fiction and Nonfiction

In the past week,  the cyber conversation about the Common Core State Standards’ call for increased reading of nonfiction texts in English Language Arts has intensified.

Education WeekEducation Week‘s featured discussion poses the questions:

  • Are you in favor of more nonfiction reading in school?
  • What challenges arise when trying to teach students to read and understand informational texts?
  • And what are some nonfiction books you would recommend for high school students?

Celebrate 100 years of NCTE!Participants in NCTE’s Connected Community have also been debating the issue in a thread titled “mandated nonfiction”.

As you may recall, Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards provides the following rationale for the shift to increased reading of informational texts:

There is also evidence that current standards, curriculum, and instructional practice have not done enough to foster the independent reading of complex texts so crucial for college and career readiness, particularly in the case of informational texts. K–12 students are, in general, given considerable scaffolding—assistance from teachers, class discussions, and the texts themselves (in such forms as summaries, glossaries, and other text features)—with reading that is already less complex overall than that typically required of students prior to 1962. What is more, students today are asked to read very little expository text—as little as 7 and 15 percent of elementary and middle school instructional reading, for example, is expository (Hoffman, Sabo, Bliss, & Hoy, 1994; Moss & Newton, 2002; Yopp & Yopp, 2006)—yet much research supports the conclusion that such text is harder for most students to read than is narrative text (Bowen & Roth, 1999; Bowen, Roth, & McGinn, 1999, 2002; Heller & Greenleaf, 2007; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008), that students need sustained exposure to expository text to develop important reading strategies (Afflerbach, Pearson, & Paris, 2008; Kintsch, 1998, 2009; McNamara, Graesser, & Louwerse, in press; Perfetti, Landi, & Oakhill, 2005; van den Broek, Lorch, Linderholm, & Gustafson, 2001; van den Broek, Risden, & Husebye-Hartmann, 1995), and that expository text makes up the vast majority of the required reading in college and the workplace (Achieve, Inc., 2007). Worse still, what little expository reading students are asked to do is too often of the superficial variety that involves skimming and scanning for particular, discrete pieces of information; such reading is unlikely to prepare students for the cognitive demand of true understanding of complex text. (p. 3)

In the Publishers’ Criteria for the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Literacy, Grades 3-12David Coleman and Susan Pimental, lead authors of the standards, elaborate on the types of texts to be infused to meet this call. At the secondary level, they specify which types of texts would fit the term “literary nonfiction”:

Range and Quality of Texts: The Common Core State Standards require a greater focus on informational text in elementary school and literary nonfiction in ELA classes in grades 6–12.

Grades 6–12: ELA programs include substantially more literary nonfiction. The Common Core State Standards require aligned ELA curriculum materials in grades 6–12 to include a blend of literature (fiction, poetry, and drama) and a substantial sampling of literary nonfiction, including essays; speeches; opinion pieces; biographies; journalism; and historical, scientific, or other documents written for a broad audience. (See p. 57 of the standards for more details.) Most ELA programs and materials designed for them will need to increase substantially the amount of literary nonfiction they include. The standards emphasize arguments (such as those in the U.S. foundational documents) and other literary nonfiction that is built on informational text structures rather than literary nonfiction that is structured as stories (such as memoirs or biographies). Of course, literary nonfiction extends well beyond historical documents to include the best of nonfiction written for a broad audience on a wide variety of topics, such as science, contemporary events and ideas, nature, and the arts. (Appendix B of the Common Core State Standards provides several examples of high-quality literary nonfiction.) (pp. 4-5)

The New York TimesWhat’s important to keep in mind, however, is that the CCSS are not asking us to abandon the reading of literature. Recent evidence of the potential benefits of reading fiction appeared in last Sunday’s New York Times. In an op-ed piece entitled “Your Brain on Fiction,” Annie Murphy Paul summarizes findings from neuroscience on how sensory language and figures of speech stimulate the brain and how the overlap between the neural networks that process stories and real-life social interactions can help improve our social skills and empathy. While Appendix A of the CCSS document does not reference these studies, half of the reading standards pertain to the reading of literature.

In the March 2012 issue of Educational Leadership, University of New Hampshire professor Thomas Newkirk may help English teachers who have focused their instruction predominantly on literature find the inclusion of nonfiction more palatable. While acknowledging the CCSS’s call for a reduction in narrative reading,  Newkirk argues that “narrative is the deep structure of all good writing. All good writing” (p. 29). Newkirk furthers his argument by citing cognitive psychologist and literary critic Mark Turner, who asserts: “Narrative imagining–story–is the fundamental instrument of thought. Rational capacities depend on it. It is our chief means of looking into the future, of predicting, of planning, of explaining” (cited in Newkirk, 2012, p. 29). While Turner’s assertion dates to 1996, the recent neuroscience studies seem to bear him out. And Newkirk contends that we never really read just for raw information. In fact, he observes that textbooks are not read but are instead consulted, much like a dictionary, because their organization and formatting do not require sustained attention to the development of an idea. Newkirk counters that engaging nonfiction texts–even specialized academic writing and research reports–tell a story for they address unmet social problems, irreconcilable positions in a field of study, or new evidence that challenges previous thinking. As writers of these texts–what the authors of the CCSS refer to as literary nonfiction–take us on a journey of learning and discovery, they use narrative in complex and embedded ways. Newkirk advises us not to move beyond narrative; instead he challenges us to help our students uncover how narrative drives both fiction and nonfiction texts.

As we have been transitioning to using more literary nonfiction in our English Language Arts classes, we have at times struggled to find nonfiction that would merit the descriptor “literary” and that would also merit the repeated close reading that the CCSS calls for as well. In a recent tweet, Carol Jago (@CarolJago) recommended a source for texts that would challenge students to consider conflicting perspectives on questions of substantial human interest: the John Templeton Foundation Big Questions Essay Series. In this series, great contemporary thinkers from a variety of fields share their attempts to answer six “Big Questions” in an essay format. These essays can be used for close readings that could serve as the foundation for Socratic Seminar discussions (Carol Jago’s suggestion) and can also serve as models for students for writing their own essays.  Links to more literary nonfiction can be found on a companion page, Big Questions Online, which features columns, blog posts, and feature articles.

Profile PictureAnother source of literary nonfiction mentioned in the Twitter discussion thread #engchat is Longreads: The best long-form stories on the web which is updated daily from sources including The Atlantic, Vanity Fair, Esquire, and The New Yorker. The site has a searchable archive and a subject index. For updates on new postings you can follow Longreads on Twitter (@longreads) or Tumblr, or you can like Longreads on Facebook.

If you find these sources valuable in helping you to infuse more literary nonfiction into your instruction and in helping students discover the narrative drive in nonfiction, I hope you will share your successes in the comment section.

7 Comments

Filed under Common Core Standards

Smithsonian American Art Museum–Clarice Smith National Teacher Institutes

The Smithsonian American Art Museum invites you to join colleagues from across the country for an exploration of the connections among American art, technology, and your curricula. The museum is sponsoring two week-long institutes in Washington, D.C. and the opportunity to stay connected with newfound colleagues and museum staff following the institutes.

Institutes will be held July 9-13, 2012, and July 30-August 3, 2012. Teachers of core subject areas for grades 6-12 are encouraged to apply; however, priority will be given to ELA and social studies teachers.

Online applications are due April 2, 2012.

A limited number of $500 scholarships for institute participation are also available. Scholarship applications are due April 30, 2012.

For more information about the institute, the application, and the scholarship opportunity:

http://americanart.si.edu/education/dev/cs/?pos=ad_2&adv=Smithsonian

English: The Renwick Gallery, a branch of the ...

Image via Wikipedia

Leave a comment

Filed under Professional Development, Teacher Opportunities

Genesee Valley Writing Project Extends Application Deadline for Summer Institute to March 15

Back on February 14, I posted information about the Genesee Valley Writing Project’s Summer Institute for K-12 teachers. I have just learned that the application deadline for the institute has been extended to March 15.

I hope you will consider taking advantage of this opportunity to learn more about teaching writing from colleagues and from previous institute fellows.

The link below will take you the University of Rochester’s Genesee Valley Writing Project Summer Institute webpage:

http://www.warner.rochester.edu/newsevents/story/880/

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Professional Development, Teacher Opportunities

Norman Mailer High School Writing Awards for Students and Teachers

Mailer

The Norman Mailer Center and Writers Colony and the National Council of Teachers of English are again collaborating to sponsor writing awards for teachers and students. This year’s category for both competitions is fiction.

Student submissions are due by noon CST on April 30, 2012.

Teacher submission are due by noon CST on July 6, 2012.

For information about all competitions:

http://nmcenter.org/pages/view/46/2012-norman-mailer-center-and-the-ncte-awards

For information about the high school student competition:

http://www.ncte.org/awards/student/nmwa

For information about the high school teacher competition:

http://www.ncte.org/awards/nmwa

(Discrepancy alert: This site indicates that submissions are due on July 23 rather than July 6. The Norman Mailer Center site sets a July 6 submission deadline. I’d recommend submitting by July 6.)

I hope you will encourage your students to enter, and I encourage you to consider entering the teachers’ competition!

Leave a comment

Filed under Creative Writing, Student Opportunities, Teacher Opportunities